Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15611 - 15620 of 58542 for speedy trial.

[PDF] WI APP 93
§ 948.12(1m) (2009-10)1. He appeals his judgment of conviction. Cameron contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85232 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
his counsel in connection with his bail-jumping trial. I conclude that, in each instance, Kaczmarek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118622 - 2014-07-30

WI App 93 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1368-CR Complete Title...
)[1]. He appeals his judgment of conviction. Cameron contends that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85232 - 2013-04-29

[PDF] NOTICE
No. 2009AP1573-CR 2 that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek severance of the fourth count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48363 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Clairene D. Hunt v. Clarendon National Insurance Service, Inc.
after exiting her school bus. 1 The Hunts argue that they are entitled to a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7192 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Order-SC
. He was represented at trial by Attorney Michael John Steinle. A jury convicted Starks
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118156 - 2015-01-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
counts charged following a four-day trial, and a postconviction order. Her appellate counsel filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853935 - 2024-09-25

State v. Zong Lor
by stipulating that a witness was unavailable at trial and that the ensuing admission of the witness’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3124 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gregory E. Siler
and to a fair trial. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6021 - 2005-03-31

State v. Matthew J. Andersen
-and-announce requirement when executing a search warrant at Andersen’s residence. We sustain the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3822 - 2005-03-31