Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15621 - 15630 of 64778 for b's.
Search results 15621 - 15630 of 64778 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS
agency, see § 1681s-2(b)(1)(A)-(C); violated the WCA by harassing him, see Wis. Stat. § 427.104(1)(h), (j
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87122 - 2012-09-18
agency, see § 1681s-2(b)(1)(A)-(C); violated the WCA by harassing him, see Wis. Stat. § 427.104(1)(h), (j
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87122 - 2012-09-18
CA Blank Order
of cocaine with intent to deliver, as a second or subsequent offense, as a Class D felony); 973.01(2)(b)7
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144548 - 2015-07-13
of cocaine with intent to deliver, as a second or subsequent offense, as a Class D felony); 973.01(2)(b)7
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144548 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1)(b). Ramirez, No. 2008AP3208-CR, slip op. at 4. This court held that because Ramirez’ motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71317 - 2014-09-15
(1)(b). Ramirez, No. 2008AP3208-CR, slip op. at 4. This court held that because Ramirez’ motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71317 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENT, V. AARON B. WORLEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68845 - 2014-09-15
-RESPONDENT, V. AARON B. WORLEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68845 - 2014-09-15
State v. Timothy M. F.
witness’s past conduct with the defendant. Wis. Stat. § 972.11(2)(b). Under the rape shield statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7264 - 2005-03-31
witness’s past conduct with the defendant. Wis. Stat. § 972.11(2)(b). Under the rape shield statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7264 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bobbie K.
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] For some reason, the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18646 - 2005-06-20
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] For some reason, the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18646 - 2005-06-20
State v. Kelvin Griffin
) (we generally will not review issues raised for the first time on appeal).[3] B. Unduly Harsh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8573 - 2005-03-31
) (we generally will not review issues raised for the first time on appeal).[3] B. Unduly Harsh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8573 - 2005-03-31
State v. Demetrius Newman
in that it is either (a) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (b) capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13946 - 2005-03-31
in that it is either (a) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (b) capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13946 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factors. WIS. STAT. § 973.017(2)(ad)-(b) (2023-24).2 The court may also consider a broad range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977061 - 2025-07-02
factors. WIS. STAT. § 973.017(2)(ad)-(b) (2023-24).2 The court may also consider a broad range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977061 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. William D. Whitnall
to make informed decisions regarding the representation, in violation of SCR 20:1.4(b).11 ¶14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16384 - 2017-09-21
to make informed decisions regarding the representation, in violation of SCR 20:1.4(b).11 ¶14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16384 - 2017-09-21