Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15621 - 15630 of 75215 for public records.
Search results 15621 - 15630 of 75215 for public records.
[PDF]
State v. Bernard W. Harris
not included in the record. He also notes that one of the briefs submitted to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2757 - 2017-09-19
not included in the record. He also notes that one of the briefs submitted to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2757 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 36
interfering with their rights under the Public Trust Doctrine.4 However, after investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670172 - 2023-08-08
interfering with their rights under the Public Trust Doctrine.4 However, after investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670172 - 2023-08-08
[PDF]
Frontsheet
an extensive prior record of disciplinary proceedings including three public reprimands and a 60-day
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770391 - 2024-02-27
an extensive prior record of disciplinary proceedings including three public reprimands and a 60-day
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770391 - 2024-02-27
James Grafft v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
the permit, finding that the proposed project would be detrimental to the public interest, contrary to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2103 - 2005-03-31
the permit, finding that the proposed project would be detrimental to the public interest, contrary to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2103 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
during an Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) investigation. See Public Reprimand of William J. Grogan
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115027 - 2014-06-18
during an Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) investigation. See Public Reprimand of William J. Grogan
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115027 - 2014-06-18
State v. Jeffery L. Watson
that opportunity to apply for parole. Not withstanding his horrible record, but I think – I asked for the 40-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13804 - 2005-03-31
that opportunity to apply for parole. Not withstanding his horrible record, but I think – I asked for the 40-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13804 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of public protection, to require the person to comply with the reporting requirements ....” In deciding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140978 - 2015-04-29
of public protection, to require the person to comply with the reporting requirements ....” In deciding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140978 - 2015-04-29
2007 WI APP 7
compliance is recorded. A fee of $75 may be charged for a second reinspection, a fee of $150 for a third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27483 - 2007-01-30
compliance is recorded. A fee of $75 may be charged for a second reinspection, a fee of $150 for a third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27483 - 2007-01-30
State v. Jeffrey L. Watson
that opportunity to apply for parole. Not withstanding his horrible record, but I think – I asked for the 40-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14117 - 2005-03-31
that opportunity to apply for parole. Not withstanding his horrible record, but I think – I asked for the 40-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14117 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250628 - 2019-11-26
allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250628 - 2019-11-26