Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15631 - 15640 of 29823 for des.
Search results 15631 - 15640 of 29823 for des.
2009 WI APP 91
of statutory interpretation and the constitutionality of a statute. We review both questions de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36492 - 2009-06-29
of statutory interpretation and the constitutionality of a statute. We review both questions de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36492 - 2009-06-29
Daniel R. Taylor v. Susan M. Taylor
de novo. Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 30, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1998). When the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4827 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 30, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1998). When the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4827 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark Andrew Rea
/her constitutional right to present a defense is subject to our de novo review. In Interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8110 - 2005-03-31
/her constitutional right to present a defense is subject to our de novo review. In Interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8110 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as No. 2013AP2768-CR 3 a result of the juror’s inattentiveness is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137502 - 2017-09-21
as No. 2013AP2768-CR 3 a result of the juror’s inattentiveness is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137502 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Thames, 2005 WI App 101, ¶10, 281 Wis. 2d 772, 700 N.W.2d 285
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040799 - 2025-11-25
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Thames, 2005 WI App 101, ¶10, 281 Wis. 2d 772, 700 N.W.2d 285
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040799 - 2025-11-25
State v. Jared J.
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
as it reviewed Peil’s prior history. Such a de minimis reference does not negate the overall accuracy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91806 - 2014-09-15
as it reviewed Peil’s prior history. Such a de minimis reference does not negate the overall accuracy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91806 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291974 - 2020-09-29
presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291974 - 2020-09-29
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Meddaugh
to undisputed facts is a question of law which we decide de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3714 - 2017-09-19
to undisputed facts is a question of law which we decide de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3714 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph A. Weiss
is sought presents a legal issue that we review de novo. State v. Rodriguez, 205 Wis.2d 620, 626, 556 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13402 - 2017-09-21
is sought presents a legal issue that we review de novo. State v. Rodriguez, 205 Wis.2d 620, 626, 556 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13402 - 2017-09-21