Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15631 - 15640 of 45836 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 15631 - 15640 of 45836 for paternity test paper work.
County of Vernon v. Jeffrey H. Millikin
a judgment of conviction only for OMVWI. Millikin’s sole argument on appeal is that the blood test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14658 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of conviction only for OMVWI. Millikin’s sole argument on appeal is that the blood test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14658 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher T. Gile
for failure to submit to a test for intoxication. Gile contends the implied consent law unconstitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5632 - 2005-03-31
for failure to submit to a test for intoxication. Gile contends the implied consent law unconstitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5632 - 2005-03-31
State v. James C. Stigney
). In response, Stigney stated that he would submit to the blood test, which revealed his blood alcohol content
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16161 - 2005-03-31
). In response, Stigney stated that he would submit to the blood test, which revealed his blood alcohol content
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16161 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Dane v. Todd M. Oimoen
obtained evidence through a less-invasive breath test; and (2) even if the blood draw was lawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4808 - 2017-09-20
obtained evidence through a less-invasive breath test; and (2) even if the blood draw was lawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4808 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. James C. Stigney
. STAT. § 343.305(4). In response, Stigney stated that he would submit to the blood test, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16161 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 343.305(4). In response, Stigney stated that he would submit to the blood test, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16161 - 2017-09-21
State v. Melvin L. Moffett
The State and the defendants agree that the following two-part test applies to a multiplicity challenge:[10
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17532 - 2005-03-31
The State and the defendants agree that the following two-part test applies to a multiplicity challenge:[10
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17532 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jerrell I. Denson
that the following two-part test applies to a multiplicity challenge: 10 (1) are the charged offenses identical
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17533 - 2017-09-21
that the following two-part test applies to a multiplicity challenge: 10 (1) are the charged offenses identical
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17533 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Melvin L. Moffett
that the following two-part test applies to a multiplicity challenge: 10 (1) are the charged offenses identical
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17532 - 2017-09-21
that the following two-part test applies to a multiplicity challenge: 10 (1) are the charged offenses identical
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17532 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jerrell I. Denson
The State and the defendants agree that the following two-part test applies to a multiplicity challenge:[10
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17533 - 2005-03-31
The State and the defendants agree that the following two-part test applies to a multiplicity challenge:[10
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17533 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
the wrong test——prejudicial reliance2——when it affirmed the circuit court. We must, therefore, reverse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25474 - 2017-09-21
the wrong test——prejudicial reliance2——when it affirmed the circuit court. We must, therefore, reverse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25474 - 2017-09-21