Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15641 - 15650 of 30172 for de.
Search results 15641 - 15650 of 30172 for de.
State v. Michael A. Simmons
court directed a verdict in Simmons’ favor and accepted testimony that there was de minimus contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5489 - 2005-03-31
court directed a verdict in Simmons’ favor and accepted testimony that there was de minimus contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5489 - 2005-03-31
Fidelis I. Omegbu v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District
. DISCUSSION We review de novo the trial court’s grant of summary judgment.[4] See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13074 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION We review de novo the trial court’s grant of summary judgment.[4] See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13074 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6211 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6211 - 2005-03-31
Cassondra Pearson v. Joshua M. Prissel
. The court granted the motion. Prissel appeals. Discussion ¶8 We review summary judgments de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21375 - 2006-02-13
. The court granted the motion. Prissel appeals. Discussion ¶8 We review summary judgments de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21375 - 2006-02-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. McGill, 2000 WI 38, ¶17, 234 Wis. 2d 560, 609 N.W.2d 795. We review de novo, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162985 - 2017-09-21
. State v. McGill, 2000 WI 38, ¶17, 234 Wis. 2d 560, 609 N.W.2d 795. We review de novo, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162985 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those facts warrant suppression
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146730 - 2017-09-21
unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those facts warrant suppression
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146730 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
DISCUSSION ¶5 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190546 - 2017-09-21
DISCUSSION ¶5 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190546 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
applies is one of law, which we review de novo.2 DeFever v. City of Waukesha, 2007 WI App 266, ¶6
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257448 - 2020-04-15
applies is one of law, which we review de novo.2 DeFever v. City of Waukesha, 2007 WI App 266, ¶6
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257448 - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael M. Longcore
review de novo. 4 State v. Michels, 141 Wis. 2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311 (Ct. App. 1987). The goal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2553 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. 4 State v. Michels, 141 Wis. 2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311 (Ct. App. 1987). The goal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2553 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. Id. at 127-28. ¶7 Whether a plea was knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89384 - 2014-09-15
of law we review de novo. Id. at 127-28. ¶7 Whether a plea was knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89384 - 2014-09-15