Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15651 - 15660 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15651 - 15660 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Abdullah Refeeq Beyah
of whether an identification procedure denied a defendant due-process is a question of law, subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10432 - 2017-09-20
of whether an identification procedure denied a defendant due-process is a question of law, subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10432 - 2017-09-20
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
in a proceeding in circuit court is a question of law, which we review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2005-03-31
in a proceeding in circuit court is a question of law, which we review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
RDAR’s late appeal. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶9 On certiorari review, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084744 - 2026-03-03
RDAR’s late appeal. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶9 On certiorari review, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084744 - 2026-03-03
Jessica Smith v. Nikolas H. Markos
de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis.2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134, 137 (Ct. App. 1996). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13489 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis.2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134, 137 (Ct. App. 1996). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13489 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the statutory and constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29994 - 2007-08-15
the statutory and constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29994 - 2007-08-15
COURT OF APPEALS
(1999). Our review is de novo, State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132114 - 2014-12-22
(1999). Our review is de novo, State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132114 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard and methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999800 - 2025-08-26
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard and methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999800 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but whether those facts established probable cause is a legal question reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100745 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous, but whether those facts established probable cause is a legal question reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100745 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robert Perry v. Foremost Farms USA Cooperative
the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15772 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15772 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” that we review de novo. Aesthetic & Cosmetic Plastic Surgery Ctr., LLC v. DOT, 2014 WI App 88, ¶12, 356
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644974 - 2023-04-18
” that we review de novo. Aesthetic & Cosmetic Plastic Surgery Ctr., LLC v. DOT, 2014 WI App 88, ¶12, 356
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644974 - 2023-04-18