Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15651 - 15660 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 15651 - 15660 of 58546 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Mark S. Barrows
as a criminal rather than an ordinance violation on the day of trial. Because this court concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11832 - 2017-09-21
as a criminal rather than an ordinance violation on the day of trial. Because this court concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11832 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Zong Lor
that counsel performed ineffectively by stipulating that a witness was unavailable at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3124 - 2017-09-20
that counsel performed ineffectively by stipulating that a witness was unavailable at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3124 - 2017-09-20
State v. Gregory E. Siler
and to a fair trial. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6021 - 2005-03-31
and to a fair trial. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6021 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and handcuffed. ¶4 The trial court accepted the officers’ version of events. It concluded that the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33777 - 2014-09-15
and handcuffed. ¶4 The trial court accepted the officers’ version of events. It concluded that the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33777 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel N.P.
received primary placement of the children.[1] After her October 1998 release, the trial court ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16181 - 2005-03-31
received primary placement of the children.[1] After her October 1998 release, the trial court ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16181 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
)(a), and from a subsequent restitution order.[2] Upon Condon’s guilty plea, the trial court withheld sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97638 - 2013-06-04
)(a), and from a subsequent restitution order.[2] Upon Condon’s guilty plea, the trial court withheld sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97638 - 2013-06-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
counts charged following a four-day trial, and a postconviction order. Her appellate counsel filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853935 - 2024-09-25
counts charged following a four-day trial, and a postconviction order. Her appellate counsel filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853935 - 2024-09-25
[PDF]
WI APP 79
test. The trial court found that it had been in effect for more than one year and granted Ronald’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96471 - 2014-09-15
test. The trial court found that it had been in effect for more than one year and granted Ronald’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96471 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶3 McGee proceeded to trial. During voir dire, the State posed a series of hypothetical scenarios
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830891 - 2024-07-23
. ¶3 McGee proceeded to trial. During voir dire, the State posed a series of hypothetical scenarios
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830891 - 2024-07-23
George Dufield v. Tom McCormick
to support the trial court’s determination of the existence and location of the easement. He alternatively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7478 - 2005-03-31
to support the trial court’s determination of the existence and location of the easement. He alternatively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7478 - 2005-03-31