Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15661 - 15670 of 29740 for des.
Search results 15661 - 15670 of 29740 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
issue that we decide de novo, accepting the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124310 - 2014-10-15
issue that we decide de novo, accepting the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124310 - 2014-10-15
[PDF]
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12318 - 2017-09-21
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12318 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law, which we review de novo. See Naydihor, 270 Wis. 2d 585 at ¶11. ¶11 Bravick asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33176 - 2014-09-15
of law, which we review de novo. See Naydihor, 270 Wis. 2d 585 at ¶11. ¶11 Bravick asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33176 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179279 - 2017-09-21
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179279 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Darrell C. Solfest
, the issue presented by this case is one of statutory construction. As such, a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12201 - 2017-09-21
, the issue presented by this case is one of statutory construction. As such, a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12201 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. Id. at 127-28. ¶7 Whether a plea was knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89384 - 2014-09-15
of law we review de novo. Id. at 127-28. ¶7 Whether a plea was knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89384 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Wilma Wendt v. United Government Services
judgment de novo. Waters v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 124 Wis. 2d 275, 278, 369 N.W.2d 755 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7113 - 2017-09-20
judgment de novo. Waters v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 124 Wis. 2d 275, 278, 369 N.W.2d 755 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7113 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Richard W. Schlueter
of the parties.” DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a circuit court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5104 - 2017-09-19
of the parties.” DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a circuit court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5104 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
William R. Davis v. Miron Construction Co., Inc.
is a question of law we review de novo. See Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp., 99 Wis.2d 746, 758, 300 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13157 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law we review de novo. See Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp., 99 Wis.2d 746, 758, 300 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13157 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Aicher v. Wisconsin Patients Comp. Fund, 2000 WI 98, ¶18, 237
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297315 - 2020-10-20
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Aicher v. Wisconsin Patients Comp. Fund, 2000 WI 98, ¶18, 237
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297315 - 2020-10-20