Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15661 - 15670 of 29796 for des.

[PDF] State v. Bradley Lee Bearheart, Jr.
of the Wisconsin Constitution is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis.2d 486, 492, 485
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11578 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
of law which we review de novo. Borchardt v. Wilk, 156 Wis. 2d 420, 427, 456 N.W.2d 653 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72331 - 2011-10-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
offenses. Questions of statutory interpretation are questions of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144391 - 2017-09-21

James R. Grassman v. Deanna L. Grassman
. However, whether the change is substantial is a legal issue which we review de novo. See id. at 574
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16143 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
standards is a question of law that we review de novo. Therese B., 267 Wis. 2d 310, ¶21. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266925 - 2020-07-07

Mid-State Contracting, Inc. v. Superior Floor Company, Inc.
Whether to allow interest on a verdict is a question of law that we review de novo. See Weber v. CNW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5060 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as No. 2013AP2768-CR 3 a result of the juror’s inattentiveness is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137502 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
review de novo. See id., ¶44. ¶7 Although we are not bound by LIRC’s legal conclusions, we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35614 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
court’s decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91964 - 2013-01-23

COURT OF APPEALS
to confrontation. Manuel, 281 Wis. 2d 554, ¶25. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30565 - 2007-10-16