Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15671 - 15680 of 18120 for 2011.
Search results 15671 - 15680 of 18120 for 2011.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
); and see State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶¶40, 57, 333 Wis. 2d 53, 797 N.W.2d 828. The defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169799 - 2017-09-21
); and see State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶¶40, 57, 333 Wis. 2d 53, 797 N.W.2d 828. The defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169799 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Certification
testifying.” Giles, 554 U.S. at 359-61 (emphasis added); see also State v. Jensen, 2011 WI App 3, ¶22, 331
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216154 - 2018-07-26
testifying.” Giles, 554 U.S. at 359-61 (emphasis added); see also State v. Jensen, 2011 WI App 3, ¶22, 331
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216154 - 2018-07-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
committed the crimes. See WIS. STAT. § 973.046(1g) (2011-12). The law with respect to that issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194714 - 2017-09-21
committed the crimes. See WIS. STAT. § 973.046(1g) (2011-12). The law with respect to that issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194714 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2011 WI App 24, ¶25, 331 Wis. 2d 650, 795 N.W.2d 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903882 - 2025-01-22
, 2011 WI App 24, ¶25, 331 Wis. 2d 650, 795 N.W.2d 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903882 - 2025-01-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, including the costs of two summer semesters, incurred for the period from fall of 2009 through the 2011-12
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170612 - 2017-09-21
, including the costs of two summer semesters, incurred for the period from fall of 2009 through the 2011-12
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170612 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
examine the record for substantial evidence that supports the agency’s decision. See Ellis v. DOA, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78530 - 2014-09-15
examine the record for substantial evidence that supports the agency’s decision. See Ellis v. DOA, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78530 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 13, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67746 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 13, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67746 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 14, 2011) (Starks II). The Wisconsin Supreme Court granted review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701595 - 2023-09-12
, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 14, 2011) (Starks II). The Wisconsin Supreme Court granted review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701595 - 2023-09-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 State v. Powells, No. 2010AP533-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App Jan. 13, 2011), and State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338673 - 2021-02-23
2 State v. Powells, No. 2010AP533-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App Jan. 13, 2011), and State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338673 - 2021-02-23
CA Blank Order
verdict, for substantial battery, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.19(2) (2011-12).[1] Bell’s postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141953 - 2015-05-13
verdict, for substantial battery, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.19(2) (2011-12).[1] Bell’s postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141953 - 2015-05-13