Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15671 - 15680 of 29740 for des.
Search results 15671 - 15680 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Roland A. Smart
to seek de novo review. Id. at ¶6. The supreme court determined this distinction was without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4996 - 2017-09-19
to seek de novo review. Id. at ¶6. The supreme court determined this distinction was without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4996 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven J. Keizer
subject to de novo review. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis.2d 627, 639, 492 N.W.2d 633, 639 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8226 - 2005-03-31
subject to de novo review. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis.2d 627, 639, 492 N.W.2d 633, 639 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8226 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gabriel R.M.
of a statute and its application to undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10138 - 2005-03-31
of a statute and its application to undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10138 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claim. Discussion ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175141 - 2017-09-21
claim. Discussion ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175141 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
presents a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872275 - 2024-11-06
presents a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872275 - 2024-11-06
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
in a proceeding in circuit court is a question of law, which we review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2005-03-31
in a proceeding in circuit court is a question of law, which we review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Confucius Gooden
of a plea agreement presents an issue of law which we review de novo. See State v. Poole, 131 Wis.2d 359
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11869 - 2017-09-21
of a plea agreement presents an issue of law which we review de novo. See State v. Poole, 131 Wis.2d 359
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11869 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael W. Worden
a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis. 2d 222, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2116 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis. 2d 222, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2116 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo whether counterclaims state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See DeBruin v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137161 - 2017-09-21
review de novo whether counterclaims state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See DeBruin v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137161 - 2017-09-21