Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15671 - 15680 of 75306 for judgment for us.
Search results 15671 - 15680 of 75306 for judgment for us.
[PDF]
Mary H. Boatright v. Jeanette M. Spiewak
. No. 97-0036 2 APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Brown County: SUSAN E. BISCHEL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11921 - 2017-09-21
. No. 97-0036 2 APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Brown County: SUSAN E. BISCHEL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11921 - 2017-09-21
Jeffrey D. Knickmeier v. James E. Reinke
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: john
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26006 - 2006-07-26
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: john
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26006 - 2006-07-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298966 - 2020-10-27
a grant of summary judgment, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298966 - 2020-10-27
James W. Jeffords v. Pamela Scott (Jeffords)
sought clarification of the divorce judgment in the circuit court: [A]s to the $50,000 owed to James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2307 - 2005-03-31
sought clarification of the divorce judgment in the circuit court: [A]s to the $50,000 owed to James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2307 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claim. Discussion ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175141 - 2017-09-21
claim. Discussion ¶9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175141 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Bernard G. Manske v. Royal Bank
. Bernard and Luella Manske appeal the trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of Royal Bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13714 - 2014-09-15
. Bernard and Luella Manske appeal the trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of Royal Bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13714 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kevin Kirsch v. Pat Siedschlag
the motion under § 806.07(1)(h), STATS., which permits a court to set aside a judgment or an order for "any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10414 - 2017-09-20
the motion under § 806.07(1)(h), STATS., which permits a court to set aside a judgment or an order for "any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10414 - 2017-09-20
State v. Michael W. Worden
from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: Stuart a. schwartz, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2116 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: Stuart a. schwartz, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2116 - 2005-03-31
Bernard G. Manske v. Royal Bank
. VERGERONT, J. Bernard and Luella Manske appeal the trial court order granting summary judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13714 - 2005-03-31
. VERGERONT, J. Bernard and Luella Manske appeal the trial court order granting summary judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13714 - 2005-03-31
Kevin Kirsch v. Pat Siedschlag
under § 806.07(1)(h), Stats., which permits a court to set aside a judgment or an order for "any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10414 - 2005-03-31
under § 806.07(1)(h), Stats., which permits a court to set aside a judgment or an order for "any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10414 - 2005-03-31