Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15671 - 15680 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 15671 - 15680 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Mary Carolyn Iverson v. Robert Iverson
under Wisconsin’s Marital Property Act, Wis. Stat. ch. 766.[1] Wears argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6264 - 2005-03-31
under Wisconsin’s Marital Property Act, Wis. Stat. ch. 766.[1] Wears argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert V. LaCombe v. Aurora Medical Group, Inc.
Protective Company (collectively, “Dr. Karls”). LaCombe argues that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6743 - 2017-09-20
Protective Company (collectively, “Dr. Karls”). LaCombe argues that the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6743 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court and Hernandez regarding the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form and an addendum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192734 - 2017-09-21
the trial court and Hernandez regarding the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form and an addendum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192734 - 2017-09-21
William F. Kelsey v. Jens Otto Luebow
terms. On appeal, Luebow argues that: (1) the trial court should not have approved the written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11864 - 2005-03-31
terms. On appeal, Luebow argues that: (1) the trial court should not have approved the written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11864 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2017AP165-CR 2 circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it excluded at trial certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197781 - 2017-10-12
. No. 2017AP165-CR 2 circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it excluded at trial certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197781 - 2017-10-12
COURT OF APPEALS
, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.225(3) (2009-10),[1] following a jury trial. Thornton challenges his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62727 - 2011-04-12
, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.225(3) (2009-10),[1] following a jury trial. Thornton challenges his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62727 - 2011-04-12
Connie L. J. v. Michael D.
, resulting in a conviction and probation for child abuse. Connie’s therapist testified at trial that Connie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3585 - 2005-03-31
, resulting in a conviction and probation for child abuse. Connie’s therapist testified at trial that Connie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3585 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry Howard
for postconviction relief.[2] Howard argues that he is entitled to a new trial because he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14294 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief.[2] Howard argues that he is entitled to a new trial because he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14294 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Giles L. Smith
., 1 trial while incompetent. 2 The circuit court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15160 - 2017-09-21
., 1 trial while incompetent. 2 The circuit court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15160 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that: (1) Spiller’s claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel is procedurally barred; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31119 - 2014-09-15
that: (1) Spiller’s claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel is procedurally barred; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31119 - 2014-09-15