Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15681 - 15690 of 68502 for did.

State v. Anthony D. Taylor
the plea bargain, but did not pressure him to do so. In his testimony Taylor offered a different version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14171 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
admitted consuming three drinks. Due to the snowy conditions, the officers did not conduct the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27750 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
otherwise noted. No. 2010AP2092 3 property damage for something that in effect they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69199 - 2014-09-15

State v. Richard W. Foelker
then consented to take a blood test. The officer testified that he did not participate in the discussion between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10528 - 2005-03-31

Secura Insurance Company v. Jerry Brubaker
conduct.”[3] Because the circuit court did not decide whether Brubaker’s failure to appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6087 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. William H. Foucault
and that they did not act improperly in conducting their interview and search. Therefore, it denied the Foucaults
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15321 - 2017-09-21

Mark D. Petrowsky v. Robert W. Henkel
, the trial court’s determination as to what the parties did and how the land appeared are facts. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12123 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
property damage for something that in effect they did previously authorize someone to—to accomplish.” ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69199 - 2011-08-08

[PDF] State v. Gale Johnson
the trial court, however, that the comment did not create any negative feelings toward the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15677 - 2017-09-21

Oneida Housing Authority v. Kathy Gilsoul
. Gilsoul additionally argues that she did not breach the terms of the agreement. Because Gilsoul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16333 - 2005-03-31