Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15691 - 15700 of 30172 for de.
Search results 15691 - 15700 of 30172 for de.
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
de novo. See State v. Echols, 152 Wis.2d 725, 739, 449 N.W.2d 320, 325 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Echols, 152 Wis.2d 725, 739, 449 N.W.2d 320, 325 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert W. Sweat
] Statutory construction is a question of law which we review de novo. Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9391 - 2005-03-31
] Statutory construction is a question of law which we review de novo. Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9391 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was sua sponte demonstrates no error. ¶11 The grant of summary judgment itself we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97918 - 2013-06-11
was sua sponte demonstrates no error. ¶11 The grant of summary judgment itself we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97918 - 2013-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
The grant of a motion for summary judgment is a matter of law that this court reviews de novo. Torgerson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27093 - 2006-11-13
The grant of a motion for summary judgment is a matter of law that this court reviews de novo. Torgerson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27093 - 2006-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS
and the compulsory counterclaim rule to a particular set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105852 - 2013-12-18
and the compulsory counterclaim rule to a particular set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105852 - 2013-12-18
State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
question which we review de novo. ¶7 Cottingham first argues that trial counsel failed to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2005-03-31
question which we review de novo. ¶7 Cottingham first argues that trial counsel failed to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2005-03-31
Micah Oriedo v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
of a statute may be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4059 - 2005-03-31
of a statute may be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4059 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court reviews de novo. State v. Waushara County Bd. of Adjustment, 2004 WI 56, ¶14, 271 Wis. 2d 547
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32647 - 2008-05-07
court reviews de novo. State v. Waushara County Bd. of Adjustment, 2004 WI 56, ¶14, 271 Wis. 2d 547
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32647 - 2008-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
meet the probable cause standard is a question of law the court reviews de novo. Id. ¶8 Zellmer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72836 - 2011-10-26
meet the probable cause standard is a question of law the court reviews de novo. Id. ¶8 Zellmer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72836 - 2011-10-26
[PDF]
Robert E. Bowman v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
). Additionally, interpretation of an ordinance is a question of law which we review de novo. Browndale Int’l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11252 - 2017-09-19
). Additionally, interpretation of an ordinance is a question of law which we review de novo. Browndale Int’l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11252 - 2017-09-19