Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15691 - 15700 of 29810 for des.
Search results 15691 - 15700 of 29810 for des.
State v. Roland A. Smart
in smaller counties were allowed to seek de novo review. Id. at ¶6. The supreme court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4996 - 2005-03-31
in smaller counties were allowed to seek de novo review. Id. at ¶6. The supreme court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4996 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Jiles, 2003 WI 66, ¶26, 262 Wis. 2d 457, 663 N.W.2d 798. We review both determinations de novo because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140210 - 2015-04-16
. Jiles, 2003 WI 66, ¶26, 262 Wis. 2d 457, 663 N.W.2d 798. We review both determinations de novo because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140210 - 2015-04-16
WI App 7 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2615 Complete Title of ...
or fundamental is a question of law we review de novo. Id., ¶6. The burden of establishing that a defect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130563 - 2015-03-11
or fundamental is a question of law we review de novo. Id., ¶6. The burden of establishing that a defect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130563 - 2015-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
to determine de novo whether the totality of the circumstances that he described establishes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102003 - 2013-09-16
to determine de novo whether the totality of the circumstances that he described establishes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102003 - 2013-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. Van DE Hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54735 - 2010-09-22
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. Van DE Hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54735 - 2010-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. This contention is based on the premise that the hearing officer’s interview of Sergeant Immel constituted a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30885 - 2007-11-14
. This contention is based on the premise that the hearing officer’s interview of Sergeant Immel constituted a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30885 - 2007-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89, ¶15, 302 Wis. 2d 428, 734 N.W.2d 411. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49635 - 2010-05-03
that we review de novo. See Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89, ¶15, 302 Wis. 2d 428, 734 N.W.2d 411. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49635 - 2010-05-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Armour v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679391 - 2023-07-18
). The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Armour v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679391 - 2023-07-18
[PDF]
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12594 - 2017-09-21
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12594 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tecia D.B.
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6838 - 2005-03-31
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6838 - 2005-03-31