Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15691 - 15700 of 65882 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 15691 - 15700 of 65882 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
Michael A. Stauffacher v. Douglas E. Stoneman
counsel's argument for judgment. Stoneman ignores two additional parts of the record. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10712 - 2017-09-20
counsel's argument for judgment. Stoneman ignores two additional parts of the record. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10712 - 2017-09-20
State v. Nicholaas P.J. Ligtenberg
, the record must reflect not only his deliberate choice to proceed without counsel, but also his awareness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5919 - 2005-03-31
, the record must reflect not only his deliberate choice to proceed without counsel, but also his awareness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5919 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shah N. Mian
on the record of the trial and postconviction hearing. Without trial court findings on the issue of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15276 - 2005-03-31
on the record of the trial and postconviction hearing. Without trial court findings on the issue of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15276 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108292 - 2014-02-25
of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108292 - 2014-02-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Kind was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103479 - 2017-09-21
. Kind was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103479 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jason D. Schultz
will search the record to determine whether the record supports the trial court's exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8666 - 2017-09-19
will search the record to determine whether the record supports the trial court's exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8666 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
personally on the record that [it] is not bound by any plea agreement and ascertain whether the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32221 - 2014-09-15
personally on the record that [it] is not bound by any plea agreement and ascertain whether the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32221 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534825 - 2022-06-22
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534825 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2022AP1554 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
2022AP1554 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256926 - 2020-04-14
a supplemental no-merit report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256926 - 2020-04-14