Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
awarded Ken and Darese joint legal custody and shared physical placement of the children. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32427 - 2008-04-14
awarded Ken and Darese joint legal custody and shared physical placement of the children. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32427 - 2008-04-14
Marlene A. Freitag v. Scott D. Freitag
. The value of that property was substantially increased by Scott’s and Marlene’s joint effort to rebuild
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13757 - 2005-03-31
. The value of that property was substantially increased by Scott’s and Marlene’s joint effort to rebuild
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13757 - 2005-03-31
Lynn G. Jochem v. Jerome F. Jochem
under that provision. Jerome has custody of the child and his support obligation is subsumed in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8066 - 2005-03-31
under that provision. Jerome has custody of the child and his support obligation is subsumed in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8066 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Diane K.J. v. James L.J.
and Diane K.J. stipulated to joint custody, but continued to haggle over the specific terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8418 - 2017-09-19
and Diane K.J. stipulated to joint custody, but continued to haggle over the specific terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8418 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
negligent supervision. ¶3 Christopher and Cheryl share joint custody of Jacob. Between January and May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54313 - 2014-09-15
negligent supervision. ¶3 Christopher and Cheryl share joint custody of Jacob. Between January and May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54313 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
The Third Branch, spring 2001
Farewell to Three Key Administrators Courts’ Budget Stalls in Joint Finance The Legislature’s budget
/news/thirdbranch/docs/spring01.pdf - 2009-12-02
Farewell to Three Key Administrators Courts’ Budget Stalls in Joint Finance The Legislature’s budget
/news/thirdbranch/docs/spring01.pdf - 2009-12-02
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 16-05A - Interim rule
not qualifying for assignment to the Commercial Court docket under section 4, or for which a joint motion
/supreme/docs/1605ainterimrule.pdf - 2020-02-13
not qualifying for assignment to the Commercial Court docket under section 4, or for which a joint motion
/supreme/docs/1605ainterimrule.pdf - 2020-02-13
[PDF]
16-05D Proposed Amendmet to Interim Rules
Court docket under section 4, or for which a joint motion for discretionary assignment has been denied
/supreme/docs/1605dpropamend.pdf - 2022-02-14
Court docket under section 4, or for which a joint motion for discretionary assignment has been denied
/supreme/docs/1605dpropamend.pdf - 2022-02-14
[PDF]
16-05 Interim Rules - As Amended (06-29-22)
not qualifying for assignment to the Commercial Court docket under section 4, or for which a joint motion
/supreme/docs/1605interimruleasamend0629.pdf - 2022-06-29
not qualifying for assignment to the Commercial Court docket under section 4, or for which a joint motion
/supreme/docs/1605interimruleasamend0629.pdf - 2022-06-29
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 16-05B - Interim rule (as amended 2/20/20)
to the Commercial Court docket under section 4, or for which a joint motion for discretionary assignment has been
/supreme/docs/1605binterimrule.pdf - 2020-02-20
to the Commercial Court docket under section 4, or for which a joint motion for discretionary assignment has been
/supreme/docs/1605binterimrule.pdf - 2020-02-20