Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 14662 for ag.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 14662 for ag.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
It considered the twenty-nine-year age difference between Saunders and N.P.W. and that “you were the adult, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182358 - 2017-09-21
It considered the twenty-nine-year age difference between Saunders and N.P.W. and that “you were the adult, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182358 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, Sr. appeals from a judgment of conviction for first-degree sexual contact with a person under age
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99310 - 2013-07-21
, Sr. appeals from a judgment of conviction for first-degree sexual contact with a person under age
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99310 - 2013-07-21
State v. Dwayne O. Jackson
no contest to a charge of sexual intercourse with a child over the age of sixteen as a repeater pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3333 - 2005-03-31
no contest to a charge of sexual intercourse with a child over the age of sixteen as a repeater pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3333 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gerald M. Turner, Jr. v. State
of the subject’s release date. See § 980.02(2)(ag), STATS. Turner moved to dismiss the sexual predator action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10278 - 2017-09-20
of the subject’s release date. See § 980.02(2)(ag), STATS. Turner moved to dismiss the sexual predator action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10278 - 2017-09-20
State v. Earl DeWayne Phiffer
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The State charged Phiffer with sexual assault of a child under the age of sixteen based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19282 - 2005-08-10
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The State charged Phiffer with sexual assault of a child under the age of sixteen based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19282 - 2005-08-10
[PDF]
State v. Harlan L. Horswill
with a person under the age of sixteen in violation of § 948.02(2). He contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12072 - 2017-09-21
with a person under the age of sixteen in violation of § 948.02(2). He contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12072 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no such finding here. The State contends that Howell’s life sentence with parole eligibility at age
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450872 - 2021-11-09
no such finding here. The State contends that Howell’s life sentence with parole eligibility at age
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450872 - 2021-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the court focused on the victim’s youth but unknowingly overlooked his young age at the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206951 - 2018-01-17
and the court focused on the victim’s youth but unknowingly overlooked his young age at the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206951 - 2018-01-17
[PDF]
State v. Harlan L. Horswill
with a person under the age of sixteen in violation of § 948.02(2). He contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12071 - 2017-09-21
with a person under the age of sixteen in violation of § 948.02(2). He contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12071 - 2017-09-21
State v. Harlan L. Horswill
under the age of sixteen in violation of § 948.02(2). He contends that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12072 - 2005-03-31
under the age of sixteen in violation of § 948.02(2). He contends that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12072 - 2005-03-31