Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 29823 for des.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” The Worms appeal. Standard of Review ¶8 We review an order granting summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40656 - 2014-09-15
.” The Worms appeal. Standard of Review ¶8 We review an order granting summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40656 - 2014-09-15
State v. Terrence L. Webb
and charge a defendant with a felony following the defendant's exercise of his statutory right to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10964 - 2005-03-31
and charge a defendant with a felony following the defendant's exercise of his statutory right to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10964 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
recommended for publication, this court concluded that Wis. Stat. § 125.12 “contemplates a de novo [judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86799 - 2012-09-05
recommended for publication, this court concluded that Wis. Stat. § 125.12 “contemplates a de novo [judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86799 - 2012-09-05
Brendan H. Cashman v. Marina Mamalakis Huff
, 2001. On February 9, 2001, Huff filed a motion for a de novo hearing regarding Commissioner Cooper’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4216 - 2005-03-31
, 2001. On February 9, 2001, Huff filed a motion for a de novo hearing regarding Commissioner Cooper’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4216 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 33
. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See Randy A.J. v. Norma I.J., 2004 WI 41, ¶¶12, 21, 270 Wis. 2d 384, 392
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35508 - 2011-06-14
. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See Randy A.J. v. Norma I.J., 2004 WI 41, ¶¶12, 21, 270 Wis. 2d 384, 392
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35508 - 2011-06-14
Norma Nelson v. Wisconsin Education Association Insurance Trust
as a matter of law. Section 802.08(2), Stats. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo by applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7787 - 2005-03-31
as a matter of law. Section 802.08(2), Stats. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo by applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7787 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brendan H. Cashman v. Marina Mamalakis Huff
The arbitration hearing was held on February 6, 2001. On February 9, 2001, Huff filed a motion for a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4216 - 2017-09-19
The arbitration hearing was held on February 6, 2001. On February 9, 2001, Huff filed a motion for a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4216 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
A. Standard of Review and Legal Principles3 ¶14 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=404440 - 2021-08-05
A. Standard of Review and Legal Principles3 ¶14 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=404440 - 2021-08-05
[PDF]
WI APP 139
was entitled to summary judgment under a de novo standard of review.3 We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103910 - 2017-09-21
was entitled to summary judgment under a de novo standard of review.3 We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on extrinsic evidence. Moreover, our standard of review is de novo, meaning that we may affirm based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183346 - 2017-09-21
on extrinsic evidence. Moreover, our standard of review is de novo, meaning that we may affirm based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183346 - 2017-09-21