Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 29713 for des.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for publication, this court concluded that WIS. STAT. § 125.12 “contemplates a de novo [judicial] review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86799 - 2014-09-15
for publication, this court concluded that WIS. STAT. § 125.12 “contemplates a de novo [judicial] review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86799 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
G & G Trucking, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
aircraft from Wisconsin Aviation. Therefore, while incidental or de minimus use would not subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5731 - 2017-09-19
aircraft from Wisconsin Aviation. Therefore, while incidental or de minimus use would not subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5731 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those facts warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217698 - 2018-08-21
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those facts warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217698 - 2018-08-21
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, using the same methodology employed by the trial court. Old Tuckaway Assocs. Ltd. P’ship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40656 - 2009-09-09
judgment de novo, using the same methodology employed by the trial court. Old Tuckaway Assocs. Ltd. P’ship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40656 - 2009-09-09
AT&T Communications of Wisconsin v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
construction are questions of law and subject to de novo review,” but cites to cases that demonstrate that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18779 - 2005-06-29
construction are questions of law and subject to de novo review,” but cites to cases that demonstrate that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18779 - 2005-06-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
A. Standard of Review and Legal Principles3 ¶14 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=404440 - 2021-08-05
A. Standard of Review and Legal Principles3 ¶14 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=404440 - 2021-08-05
[PDF]
Village of Elm Grove v. Michael R. Johnson
. STAT. § 800.14. Because he did not request a trial de novo pursuant § 800.14(4), the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6081 - 2017-09-19
. STAT. § 800.14. Because he did not request a trial de novo pursuant § 800.14(4), the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6081 - 2017-09-19
ABC for Health, Inc. v. Commissioner of Insurance
weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. Id. at ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3208 - 2005-03-31
weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. Id. at ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3208 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Hayes Johnson
. No. 97-1360-CR 5 We review de novo the trial court’s legal analysis as to whether a presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12466 - 2017-09-21
. No. 97-1360-CR 5 We review de novo the trial court’s legal analysis as to whether a presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12466 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
P.O. Box 490 Wautoma, WI 54982-0490 Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247596 - 2019-09-25
P.O. Box 490 Wautoma, WI 54982-0490 Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247596 - 2019-09-25