Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 68502 for did.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because: (1) it did not adequately explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32470 - 2008-04-16
that the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because: (1) it did not adequately explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32470 - 2008-04-16
City of Middleton v. Daniel L. Barrett
that: (1) the circuit court's decision violated his due process rights because he did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10324 - 2005-03-31
that: (1) the circuit court's decision violated his due process rights because he did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10324 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that it would not do so and Davis’s trial lawyer did not object. After the second jury found David guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109418 - 2014-03-24
that it would not do so and Davis’s trial lawyer did not object. After the second jury found David guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109418 - 2014-03-24
State v. Troy Key
672, 680 (1988). Even though the instruction given did not instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9714 - 2005-03-31
672, 680 (1988). Even though the instruction given did not instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9714 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gerald D. Barr
factors as applied to Barr’s backyard and deck. ¶11 The trial court concluded: Mikla did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6566 - 2005-03-31
factors as applied to Barr’s backyard and deck. ¶11 The trial court concluded: Mikla did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6566 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Troy Key
A. Blundon with the intent to kill, and did not actually believe the force used was necessary to prevent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9714 - 2017-09-19
A. Blundon with the intent to kill, and did not actually believe the force used was necessary to prevent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9714 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
asserts that evidence presented at trial showed that the arresting officer did not continuously observe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106014 - 2013-12-26
asserts that evidence presented at trial showed that the arresting officer did not continuously observe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106014 - 2013-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that the circuit court did not act outside the 14-day statutory time limit for holding a final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907111 - 2025-01-30
conclude that the circuit court did not act outside the 14-day statutory time limit for holding a final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907111 - 2025-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, we conclude that the prosecutor did not breach the plea agreement. We affirm. ¶2 Mattioli
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419814 - 2021-09-02
, we conclude that the prosecutor did not breach the plea agreement. We affirm. ¶2 Mattioli
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419814 - 2021-09-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Davis’s trial lawyer did not object. After the second jury found David guilty, Davis’s postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109418 - 2017-09-21
and Davis’s trial lawyer did not object. After the second jury found David guilty, Davis’s postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109418 - 2017-09-21