Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 6666 for mix.

State v. Anthony G. Merriweather
for prejudice. This presents a mixed question of law and fact, wherein we examine two matters: (1) what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9152 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
present mixed questions of law and fact. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 698 (1984). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90571 - 2012-12-12

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
). ¶6 We apply a mixed standard of review to an order granting or denying a suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27127 - 2006-11-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to serve Bates is a mixed question of fact and law. The attempts made at service present a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92451 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
evidence. ¶4 The question of whether counsel’s actions constitute ineffective assistance is a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89675 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jacques Gibson
(1984). ¶7 Ineffective assistance of counsel claims present mixed questions of law and fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14451 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey Bland
is a mixed standard of review. First, we determine whether the motion on its face alleges sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18729 - 2005-06-27

State v. Stacy D. Davis
ineffective assistance presents a mixed question of law and fact. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3403 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the criminal complaint). STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶10 We review the denial of a motion to suppress under a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181361 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
or prejudicial is a mixed question of law and fact. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 698 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14864 - 2005-03-31