Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 12423 for mr.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 12423 for mr.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing committee that Mr. Bentley be given consideration by us in our representations by virtue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675657 - 2023-07-05
sentencing committee that Mr. Bentley be given consideration by us in our representations by virtue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675657 - 2023-07-05
[PDF]
State v. Stephen L. Grant
that: there is an appropriate amount of time and resources available to address all of the issues that Mr. Grant has raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10958 - 2017-09-19
that: there is an appropriate amount of time and resources available to address all of the issues that Mr. Grant has raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10958 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
wrote checks and drafts on your account at Legacy Bank. MR. LEE: Um-- um-- that’s correct. And I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29562 - 2007-07-02
wrote checks and drafts on your account at Legacy Bank. MR. LEE: Um-- um-- that’s correct. And I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29562 - 2007-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
which Mr. Ulrich [defense counsel] filed yesterday. And my understanding is, Mr. Ulrich, you’re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212401 - 2018-05-09
which Mr. Ulrich [defense counsel] filed yesterday. And my understanding is, Mr. Ulrich, you’re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212401 - 2018-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS
continued: Q: Is Mr. Shanks – is there anything in this photo array that you see, Exhibit No. 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72717 - 2011-10-24
continued: Q: Is Mr. Shanks – is there anything in this photo array that you see, Exhibit No. 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72717 - 2011-10-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
would then satisfy the Terry analysis. ¶14 The trial court found: The court at this time finds Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192506 - 2017-09-21
would then satisfy the Terry analysis. ¶14 The trial court found: The court at this time finds Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192506 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, there was a [2] moderate odor of intoxicants coming from Mr. Wicka, and [3] his speech was slurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34375 - 2014-09-15
, there was a [2] moderate odor of intoxicants coming from Mr. Wicka, and [3] his speech was slurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34375 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to do with me would not be used in Mr. Avina’s case. However, I later found that items pertaining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173356 - 2017-09-21
to do with me would not be used in Mr. Avina’s case. However, I later found that items pertaining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173356 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. THE COURT: Is that so, Mr. Madden, did you review the presentence report with [defense counsel]? MR. MADDEN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33114 - 2008-06-23
. THE COURT: Is that so, Mr. Madden, did you review the presentence report with [defense counsel]? MR. MADDEN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33114 - 2008-06-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the plea hearing was, “Mr. Franklin, can you hear me?” Franklin replied, “Yes.” Several minutes later
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248473 - 2019-10-07
the plea hearing was, “Mr. Franklin, can you hear me?” Franklin replied, “Yes.” Several minutes later
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248473 - 2019-10-07