Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 20937 for word.

Erin T. O'Connor v. Stuart Korshavn
that the two witnesses had no training in the legal definition of the word. Thus, it was opining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5500 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ellis H.
If we are to look at the legislative history in addition to the plain, unambiguous wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7080 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ellis H.
If we are to look at the legislative history in addition to the plain, unambiguous wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7080 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
possibly be distributed under both trusts, no specific words are required to revoke the 1995 trust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142514 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
his words—rather, he was at times difficult to understand only because he was out of breath from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963027 - 2025-05-30

[PDF] Erin T. O'Connor v. Stuart Korshavn
observed that the two witnesses had no training in the legal definition of the word. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5500 - 2017-09-19

State v. John F. Goralski
is to the effect that when the word “beer” is used, without any restrictions or qualifications, it denotes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3187 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
on the couch rather than a chair. And for me to become involved in the mother using the word “chair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131680 - 2014-12-16

2007 WI APP 36
-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning. State ex rel. Kalal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28134 - 2007-03-27

[PDF] WI APP 36
is given its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28134 - 2014-09-15