Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15701 - 15710 of 29823 for des.
Search results 15701 - 15710 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Patricia A. Leider v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8183 - 2017-09-19
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8183 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 605 N.W.2d 561 (Ct. App. 1999). This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05
, 605 N.W.2d 561 (Ct. App. 1999). This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05
State v. James Jagodinsky
York, 500 U.S. 352 (1991), that the second Batson prong involves a legal question subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31
York, 500 U.S. 352 (1991), that the second Batson prong involves a legal question subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31
City of Madison v. Jens W.L. Hinrichsen
was found guilty of both charges after a trial in Madison municipal court and requested a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11375 - 2005-03-31
was found guilty of both charges after a trial in Madison municipal court and requested a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11375 - 2005-03-31
Robert Garel v. Kenneth Morgan
interpretation is one that we review de novo. See Gorton v. Hostak, Henzl & Bichler, S.C., 217 Wis. 2d 493, 502
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15672 - 2005-03-31
interpretation is one that we review de novo. See Gorton v. Hostak, Henzl & Bichler, S.C., 217 Wis. 2d 493, 502
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15672 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel H. Frasch
and intelligently entered presents issues of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d at 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8864 - 2005-03-31
and intelligently entered presents issues of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d at 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8864 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. See id. “We review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233552 - 2019-01-29
erroneous. See id. “We review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233552 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
Jerry Saenz v. Gary McCaughtry
. However, we conclude that this error was harmless. We will review de novo the adjustment committee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13416 - 2017-09-21
. However, we conclude that this error was harmless. We will review de novo the adjustment committee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13416 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, has acknowledged arguments for both the discretionary standard as well as de novo review, and it has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980324 - 2025-07-08
, has acknowledged arguments for both the discretionary standard as well as de novo review, and it has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980324 - 2025-07-08
State v. David N. Burkhart
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31