Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15701 - 15710 of 21475 for warrants.
Search results 15701 - 15710 of 21475 for warrants.
State v. Antonio Valtierrez
on its face. Id. at 309-10. Whether a motion alleges facts warranting relief and thus entitles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5517 - 2005-03-31
on its face. Id. at 309-10. Whether a motion alleges facts warranting relief and thus entitles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5517 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregory L. Schroeder
conference on January 16, 1996, the trial court issued a bench warrant and removed the case from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13026 - 2005-03-31
conference on January 16, 1996, the trial court issued a bench warrant and removed the case from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13026 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the police did not have consent to be in the home, and their presence exceeded the scope of their warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94101 - 2013-03-13
the police did not have consent to be in the home, and their presence exceeded the scope of their warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94101 - 2013-03-13
Michael Schnake v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
instances warranted findings of contempt because they both (1) fell within the definition of contempt in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18177 - 2005-05-16
instances warranted findings of contempt because they both (1) fell within the definition of contempt in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18177 - 2005-05-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at the facility to warrant a finding that he would not be a significant risk to cause bodily harm to others
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772461 - 2024-03-06
at the facility to warrant a finding that he would not be a significant risk to cause bodily harm to others
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772461 - 2024-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the restitution order and alleged sufficient facts to warrant a hearing; (2) the court’s restitution order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011081 - 2025-09-17
the restitution order and alleged sufficient facts to warrant a hearing; (2) the court’s restitution order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011081 - 2025-09-17
[PDF]
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
within the 30 days. ¶5 A federal warrant was issued for Koopmans' arrest and she was apprehended
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16969 - 2017-09-21
within the 30 days. ¶5 A federal warrant was issued for Koopmans' arrest and she was apprehended
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16969 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. Jesse B. Eagle
by the consumption of intoxicants to warrant an arrest. Furthermore, the trial court record fails to indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7645 - 2017-09-19
by the consumption of intoxicants to warrant an arrest. Furthermore, the trial court record fails to indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7645 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not a difference significant enough to warrant reopening the judgment. ¶11 The Montesanos argue on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112361 - 2017-09-21
was not a difference significant enough to warrant reopening the judgment. ¶11 The Montesanos argue on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, no other issues warrant discussion. We conclude that any further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117455 - 2017-09-21
independent review of the record, no other issues warrant discussion. We conclude that any further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117455 - 2017-09-21

