Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15711 - 15720 of 30172 for de.
Search results 15711 - 15720 of 30172 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, as we do any written instrument. See Waters v. Waters, 2007 WI App 40, ¶6, 300 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110388 - 2017-09-21
judgment de novo, as we do any written instrument. See Waters v. Waters, 2007 WI App 40, ¶6, 300 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees freedom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193660 - 2017-09-21
is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees freedom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193660 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Richard W. Schlueter
of the parties.” DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a circuit court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5104 - 2017-09-19
of the parties.” DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a circuit court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5104 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in favor of Quorum. Rumpf appeals. We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168836 - 2017-09-21
in favor of Quorum. Rumpf appeals. We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168836 - 2017-09-21
State v. Troy D. Forler
supports the submission of a lesser-included offense is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15335 - 2005-03-31
supports the submission of a lesser-included offense is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15335 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
accept the court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53254 - 2010-08-11
accept the court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53254 - 2010-08-11
William Ellingsworth v. Frederick Swiggum
. The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
. The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mohammed A. Nonahal
Whether the IAD was violated is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2339 - 2005-03-31
Whether the IAD was violated is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2339 - 2005-03-31
Lincoln Savings Bank v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
decision, we need not resolve that multi-layered conundrum here because even under de novo review we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10245 - 2005-03-31
decision, we need not resolve that multi-layered conundrum here because even under de novo review we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10245 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). Statutory interpretation is an issue of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Ozuna
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644620 - 2023-04-13
omitted). Statutory interpretation is an issue of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Ozuna
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644620 - 2023-04-13