Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15711 - 15720 of 29823 for des.

COURT OF APPEALS
principles to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Drew, 2007 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36845 - 2009-06-17

COURT OF APPEALS
was sua sponte demonstrates no error. ¶11 The grant of summary judgment itself we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97918 - 2013-06-11

Eddie Crews v. Freeman Roofing, Inc.
from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2261 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Steven J. Keizer
a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis.2d 627, 639, 492 N.W.2d 633, 639 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8226 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
facts which would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08

WI App 46 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2692-CR Complete Title...
be addressed de novo by the court. Facts ¶3 Daniel was charged with being a party to the crime of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109975 - 2014-05-27

Jeannette L. Brandner v. Richard Stelnick
). We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Ford Farms, Ltd. v. Wisconsin Elec. Power Co., 145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11257 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Michael S. Zeller v. Dennis D. Stockel
for de novo review. See id. ¶9 Generally, in reviewing a conveyance instrument for compliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18186 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kirk W. Holstein
this court reviews de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal, Holstein posits that the “anonymous” report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4957 - 2005-03-31

Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12318 - 2005-03-31