Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15711 - 15720 of 68499 for did.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of ...
. In this case, the trial court did not inform Alex of the charges against him until after all of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30872 - 2007-11-13

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Clay F. Teasdale
. The matter was submitted to a referee. Teasdale answered and appeared pro se but did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16823 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Brenda Fox v. Daniel Larson
to him because of the money he did have in the business. He earned at least $30,000.00 more than I did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3766 - 2017-09-19

Robert L. Worthon, Jr. v. Gerald A
reasonably have made the decision it did, the court does not conduct a de novo review. Van Ermen v. DHSS, 84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7939 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
girlfriend Luisa Lopez did not have authority to consent to the search of their shared apartment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320515 - 2021-01-12

[PDF] City of Middleton v. James H. Parkin
-2- untimely because the municipal court did not enter a judgment against him. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10120 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Waylon M. Redding v. David H. Schwarz
and continues to violate.” She did not explain why the DOC simultaneously sought revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3561 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in exchange for Lopez’s plea. The circuit court informed Lopez that it did not have to follow
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115924 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
this period, Hinze sought an itemized statement from Reedsburg, which he did not receive until December 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36419 - 2009-05-06

State v. Jesse J. Schloemer
did not have reasonable grounds to stop Schloemer's vehicle pursuant to § 345.22, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9138 - 2005-03-31