Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15721 - 15730 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 15721 - 15730 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
Fox City Scale, Inc. v. Badger Scale, Inc.
Fox City sued Stratz/Badger, alleging eight claims for monetary and/or declaratory relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12126 - 2017-09-21
Fox City sued Stratz/Badger, alleging eight claims for monetary and/or declaratory relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12126 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bradford F. Lescher
. Lescher claims the trial court erred in imposing a sixty-day electronic surveillance sentence. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9238 - 2017-09-19
. Lescher claims the trial court erred in imposing a sixty-day electronic surveillance sentence. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9238 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James Robleski v. Vernon Moore
claim; and (3) the trial court failed to address the issue of privity. Because the record fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2851 - 2017-09-19
claim; and (3) the trial court failed to address the issue of privity. Because the record fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2851 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jean H.
claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in terminating her rights; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15634 - 2005-03-31
claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in terminating her rights; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15634 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bradford F. Lescher
modification. Lescher claims the trial court erred in imposing a sixty-day electronic surveillance sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9238 - 2005-03-31
modification. Lescher claims the trial court erred in imposing a sixty-day electronic surveillance sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, that dismissed her claims against several Barron County employees, arising from law enforcement’s response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690774 - 2023-08-15
, that dismissed her claims against several Barron County employees, arising from law enforcement’s response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690774 - 2023-08-15
CA Blank Order
to raise these claims as part of his direct appeal, they are procedurally barred. We affirm. Following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135068 - 2015-02-17
to raise these claims as part of his direct appeal, they are procedurally barred. We affirm. Following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135068 - 2015-02-17
[PDF]
State v. Albert Steven Winfrey
. This claim is waived for lack of a proper record. In order to obtain appellate review of an ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7907 - 2017-09-19
. This claim is waived for lack of a proper record. In order to obtain appellate review of an ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7907 - 2017-09-19
State v. Eric P. Russell
his postconviction motions. Russell claims: (1) that he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8409 - 2005-03-31
his postconviction motions. Russell claims: (1) that he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8409 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
rehabilitation efforts did not constitute new factors, and that Moore’s due process claims were barred by State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341367 - 2021-03-02
rehabilitation efforts did not constitute new factors, and that Moore’s due process claims were barred by State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341367 - 2021-03-02