Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15721 - 15730 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15721 - 15730 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6205 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6205 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo. See id. at 634. ¶6 When a defendant pursues postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127185 - 2014-11-11
are questions of law that we review de novo. See id. at 634. ¶6 When a defendant pursues postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127185 - 2014-11-11
State v. Jesse Ruiz
review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 309-10. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05
review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 309-10. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05
State v. Tommy Lo
we review de novo. Id. Lo argues first that the condition that he “have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14435 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. Id. Lo argues first that the condition that he “have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14435 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27185 - 2006-11-20
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27185 - 2006-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 555, 567, 278 N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107933 - 2014-02-10
. 2d 555, 567, 278 N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107933 - 2014-02-10
Ruth M. Bendimez v. Allen M. Neidermire and Cecelia E. Neidermire
the appellants appeal. We review a trial court’s decision denying summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13710 - 2005-03-31
the appellants appeal. We review a trial court’s decision denying summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13710 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald C. Foust
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. It is thus a question of law, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. It is thus a question of law, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Healthcare Servs. Grp., Inc. v. DOR, 2018 WI App 48, ¶10, 383 Wis. 2d 699, 916 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932371 - 2025-03-25
review de novo. Healthcare Servs. Grp., Inc. v. DOR, 2018 WI App 48, ¶10, 383 Wis. 2d 699, 916 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932371 - 2025-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
) (“Interpretation and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law, reviewable de novo.”). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83708 - 2012-06-18
) (“Interpretation and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law, reviewable de novo.”). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83708 - 2012-06-18