Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15731 - 15740 of 63951 for records/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and addressed him in the courtroom on the record: [THE COURT:] I received a note from one of the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454291 - 2021-11-23

CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122843 - 2014-09-30

COURT OF APPEALS
be allowed to withdraw it. We conclude that the record establishes that although the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36196 - 2009-04-15

[PDF] Waterloo & Sioux Falls, Ltd. v. National Guardian Life Insurance Company
or judgment in the record, only a document signed by the trial judge and entitled “Decision After Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11958 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Dale W. Johnson v. Marilyn J. Kaneshiro
to keep proper accounts and (2) erroneously calculated the amount of surcharge due. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8764 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
to protect the public. Id. at 623. It also may consider the defendant’s past criminal record, history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50757 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for 1999. The clerk had no copies of, or index records for, either commissioner for the years 1990-98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123553 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Matthew Edwin Voigt
nature of the crime; the past record of criminal offenses; any history of undesirable behavior patterns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19827 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
on the record that he was not challenging the other acts for strategic reasons. Counsel confirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94948 - 2013-04-08

State v. Owen Andrew Kreinus
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that he is not entitled to relief. See State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17754 - 2005-04-18