Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15741 - 15750 of 91970 for 1.
Search results 15741 - 15750 of 91970 for 1.
William E. Currier v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
Tax Appeals Commission. Currier claims that: (1) the Wisconsin Department of Revenue lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9089 - 2005-03-31
Tax Appeals Commission. Currier claims that: (1) the Wisconsin Department of Revenue lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9089 - 2005-03-31
State v. James E. Schultz
of correspondence in Schultz's and his wife's names.[1] The affidavit also stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10215 - 2005-03-31
of correspondence in Schultz's and his wife's names.[1] The affidavit also stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10215 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
c. stewart, jr., Judge. Reversed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32798 - 2008-05-27
c. stewart, jr., Judge. Reversed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32798 - 2008-05-27
Paul H. Raasoch v. Sandra Sue Raasoch
. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Lundsten and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6766 - 2005-03-31
. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Lundsten and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6766 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
. Affirmed. ¶1 DAVID T. PROSSER, J. This is a review of a published decision of the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36879 - 2009-06-22
. Affirmed. ¶1 DAVID T. PROSSER, J. This is a review of a published decision of the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36879 - 2009-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, except for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963440 - 2025-05-30
, except for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963440 - 2025-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). No. 2022AP1562 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Judson Pellett’s father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717354 - 2023-10-19
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). No. 2022AP1562 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Judson Pellett’s father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717354 - 2023-10-19
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Lechner
. No. 96-2830-CR 1 NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17163 - 2017-09-21
. No. 96-2830-CR 1 NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17163 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Clean Wisconsin, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
from an order of the Circuit Court for Dane County, David T. Flanagan, III, Judge. Reversed. ¶1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18773 - 2017-09-21
from an order of the Circuit Court for Dane County, David T. Flanagan, III, Judge. Reversed. ¶1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18773 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Response to Letter Briefs (BLOC)
1 October 13, 2021 Via Email & Hand Delivery Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of the Supreme Court
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/resltrbriefsbloc.pdf - 2021-10-18
1 October 13, 2021 Via Email & Hand Delivery Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of the Supreme Court
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/resltrbriefsbloc.pdf - 2021-10-18