Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15741 - 15750 of 30012 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15741 - 15750 of 30012 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See Washburn Cnty. v. Smith, 2008 WI 23, ¶16, 308 Wis. 2d 65, 746 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118797 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law we review de novo. See Washburn Cnty. v. Smith, 2008 WI 23, ¶16, 308 Wis. 2d 65, 746 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118797 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Lincoln Savings Bank v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
not resolve that multi-layered conundrum here because even under de novo review we believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10245 - 2017-09-20
not resolve that multi-layered conundrum here because even under de novo review we believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10245 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48600 - 2014-09-15
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48600 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment or order is void for lack of jurisdiction is a matter of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382494 - 2021-06-29
a judgment or order is void for lack of jurisdiction is a matter of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382494 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
State v. John F. Draves
de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05. NOS. 96-1466-CR 96-1467-CR 4 A court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10859 - 2017-09-20
de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05. NOS. 96-1466-CR 96-1467-CR 4 A court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10859 - 2017-09-20
Richard Zeininger v. Affordable Builders of Wisconsin, Inc.
presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Borchardt v. Wilk, 156 Wis.2d 420, 427, 456 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8349 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Borchardt v. Wilk, 156 Wis.2d 420, 427, 456 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8349 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). “Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194499 - 2017-09-21
). “Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194499 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15, ¶9, 331 Wis. 2d 431, 793 N.W.2d 920 (2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997177 - 2025-08-20
to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15, ¶9, 331 Wis. 2d 431, 793 N.W.2d 920 (2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997177 - 2025-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
intrusion was “de minimis” because “[t]he driver is being asked to expose to view very little more of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108799 - 2014-03-10
intrusion was “de minimis” because “[t]he driver is being asked to expose to view very little more of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108799 - 2014-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
of this appeal requires us to interpret and apply Wis. Stat. § 803.05, and we do so de novo. Christensen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46026 - 2010-01-19
of this appeal requires us to interpret and apply Wis. Stat. § 803.05, and we do so de novo. Christensen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46026 - 2010-01-19