Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15741 - 15750 of 29817 for des.
Search results 15741 - 15750 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
Marty H. Coopman v. American Family Insurance Company
contracts and the interpretation and application of statutes to undisputed facts—which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12264 - 2017-09-21
contracts and the interpretation and application of statutes to undisputed facts—which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12264 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application of constitutional principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59437 - 2014-09-15
clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application of constitutional principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59437 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of evidentiary or historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ¶18. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255163 - 2020-02-27
of evidentiary or historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ¶18. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255163 - 2020-02-27
[PDF]
Herder Hallmark Consultants, Inc. v. Regnier Consulting Group, Inc.
de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6689 - 2017-09-20
de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6689 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033397 - 2025-11-04
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033397 - 2025-11-04
COURT OF APPEALS
based on the record before it. We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103817 - 2013-11-04
based on the record before it. We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103817 - 2013-11-04
State v. Karleen K. Raasch
review de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp., 216 Wis.2d 49, 52-53, 573 N.W.2d 572, 574 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13679 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp., 216 Wis.2d 49, 52-53, 573 N.W.2d 572, 574 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13679 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo. See id. at 634. ¶6 When a defendant pursues postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127185 - 2014-11-11
are questions of law that we review de novo. See id. at 634. ¶6 When a defendant pursues postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127185 - 2014-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 555, 567, 278 N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107933 - 2014-02-10
. 2d 555, 567, 278 N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107933 - 2014-02-10
Charles Schroeder v. Linda Wacker
. As such, it presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Probst v. Winnebago County, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2130 - 2005-03-31
. As such, it presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Probst v. Winnebago County, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2130 - 2005-03-31