Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15751 - 15760 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 15751 - 15760 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; and (4) his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331042 - 2021-02-09
on his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; and (4) his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331042 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, that dismissed her claims against several Barron County employees, arising from law enforcement’s response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690774 - 2023-08-15
, that dismissed her claims against several Barron County employees, arising from law enforcement’s response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690774 - 2023-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. And the Court believes that the doctrine of laches would preclude him from raising the claim at this point
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238210 - 2019-03-26
. And the Court believes that the doctrine of laches would preclude him from raising the claim at this point
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238210 - 2019-03-26
State v. Jean H.
claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in terminating her rights; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15634 - 2005-03-31
claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in terminating her rights; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15634 - 2005-03-31
E.A. Richards v. Grunau Company, Inc.
from a trial court grant of summary judgment dismissing his claim against Grunau Company, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11346 - 2005-03-31
from a trial court grant of summary judgment dismissing his claim against Grunau Company, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11346 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. He also challenged the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, claiming that the State was not a real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010041 - 2025-09-16
. He also challenged the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, claiming that the State was not a real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010041 - 2025-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Joshua J. Alderman
Alderman argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. To substantiate a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21
Alderman argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. To substantiate a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21
James Robleski v. Vernon Moore
possession claim; and (3) the trial court failed to address the issue of privity. Because the record fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2851 - 2005-03-31
possession claim; and (3) the trial court failed to address the issue of privity. Because the record fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2851 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bradford F. Lescher
modification. Lescher claims the trial court erred in imposing a sixty-day electronic surveillance sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9238 - 2005-03-31
modification. Lescher claims the trial court erred in imposing a sixty-day electronic surveillance sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9238 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to raise these claims as part of his direct appeal, they are procedurally barred. We affirm. Following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135068 - 2015-02-17
to raise these claims as part of his direct appeal, they are procedurally barred. We affirm. Following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135068 - 2015-02-17