Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15751 - 15760 of 30012 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256126 - 2020-03-10

Thyra K. v. Community Care Organization of Milwaukee County, Inc.
are recoverable, is a question of law that is subject to our de novo review. Elliott v. Donahue, 169 Wis.2d 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11691 - 2005-03-31

Jennifer J. Lemon v. Economy Premier Assurance Company
of an insurance policy, which presents a question of law; our review is de novo. Badger Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7033 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kirk W. Holstein
this court reviews de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal, Holstein posits that the “anonymous” report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4957 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
and whether Montgomery’s due-process rights were violated are legal questions subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45574 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Louise Sterlinske v. School District of Bruce
(2), STATS. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11413 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75493 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Id. (citation omitted). ¶7 Probable cause refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41625 - 2014-09-15

Eddie Crews v. Freeman Roofing, Inc.
from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2261 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jesse Ruiz
review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 309-10. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05