Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15751 - 15760 of 30175 for de.
Search results 15751 - 15760 of 30175 for de.
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6210 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6210 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 60
is a matter of law we review de novo. Ginder v. General Cas. Co. of Wis., 2000 WI App 197, ¶4, 238 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95775 - 2014-09-15
is a matter of law we review de novo. Ginder v. General Cas. Co. of Wis., 2000 WI App 197, ¶4, 238 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95775 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James Jagodinsky
), that the second Batson prong involves a legal question subject to de novo appellate review. Cf. Purkett v. Elem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11555 - 2017-09-19
), that the second Batson prong involves a legal question subject to de novo appellate review. Cf. Purkett v. Elem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11555 - 2017-09-19
Michael Hook v. William A. Bonner and Judith L. Bonner
is a question of law we review de novo.”[2] Soc’y Ins. v. Town of Franklin, 2000 WI App 35, ¶5, 233 Wis. 2d 207
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5538 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law we review de novo.”[2] Soc’y Ins. v. Town of Franklin, 2000 WI App 35, ¶5, 233 Wis. 2d 207
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5538 - 2005-03-31
Randall G. Bobholz v. John Banaszak
. Banaszak requested a trial de novo. Following a trial that included testimony by three experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5235 - 2005-03-31
. Banaszak requested a trial de novo. Following a trial that included testimony by three experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5235 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. See Northbrook Wis., LLC v. City of Niagara, 2014 WI App 22, ¶28, 352 Wis. 2d 657, 843 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121637 - 2014-09-16
de novo. See Northbrook Wis., LLC v. City of Niagara, 2014 WI App 22, ¶28, 352 Wis. 2d 657, 843 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121637 - 2014-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
qualifies as a “premises” under Wis. Stat. § 346.61 is a question of statutory construction we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79419 - 2012-03-13
qualifies as a “premises” under Wis. Stat. § 346.61 is a question of statutory construction we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79419 - 2012-03-13
[PDF]
County of Dane v. Steven J. Granum
. App. 1995). This issue presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Piskula
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10112 - 2017-09-19
. App. 1995). This issue presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Piskula
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10112 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to those facts is reviewed de novo. See State v. Blatterman, 2015 WI 46, ¶26 n.9, 362 Wis. 2d 138, 864
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176618 - 2017-09-21
to those facts is reviewed de novo. See State v. Blatterman, 2015 WI 46, ¶26 n.9, 362 Wis. 2d 138, 864
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176618 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner denied Swieca’s motion, and Swieca moved for a de novo hearing in the circuit court. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96228 - 2013-05-01
commissioner denied Swieca’s motion, and Swieca moved for a de novo hearing in the circuit court. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96228 - 2013-05-01