Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15751 - 15760 of 68530 for did.
Search results 15751 - 15760 of 68530 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his petition but did not specifically address supervised release. ¶3 Tyler’s petition had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211395 - 2018-04-25
his petition but did not specifically address supervised release. ¶3 Tyler’s petition had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211395 - 2018-04-25
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Pettis
perfunctory responses, the court accepted the pleas prior to having a colloquy, did not inform Pettis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12578 - 2017-09-21
perfunctory responses, the court accepted the pleas prior to having a colloquy, did not inform Pettis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12578 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eugene Nichols
, Nichols argues that his trial counsel was ineffective because she did not call a witness, Scott Baldwin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14094 - 2005-03-31
, Nichols argues that his trial counsel was ineffective because she did not call a witness, Scott Baldwin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14094 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
husband's name from a deed and titling a condominium solely in her name. Attorney Loew and R.H. did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81737 - 2012-04-26
husband's name from a deed and titling a condominium solely in her name. Attorney Loew and R.H. did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81737 - 2012-04-26
[PDF]
Waushara County v. Clinton L. Duhm
in court on the afternoon of May 21, 2001. Duhm did not appear in court on the scheduled day, and on May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4531 - 2017-09-19
in court on the afternoon of May 21, 2001. Duhm did not appear in court on the scheduled day, and on May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4531 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Waushara County v. Clinton L. Duhm
in court on the afternoon of May 21, 2001. Duhm did not appear in court on the scheduled day, and on May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4530 - 2017-09-19
in court on the afternoon of May 21, 2001. Duhm did not appear in court on the scheduled day, and on May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4530 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the call. He also believed Klevesahl might be intoxicated and did not want to leave him, fearing he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35890 - 2014-09-15
to the call. He also believed Klevesahl might be intoxicated and did not want to leave him, fearing he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35890 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
found that it was “much more likely that [Wells] did not reveal his medical condition to [trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500457 - 2022-03-30
found that it was “much more likely that [Wells] did not reveal his medical condition to [trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500457 - 2022-03-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in exchange for Lopez’s plea. The circuit court informed Lopez that it did not have to follow
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115924 - 2017-09-21
in exchange for Lopez’s plea. The circuit court informed Lopez that it did not have to follow
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115924 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carmen L. Harrell
erroneously exercised its discretion: (1) by deciding that the new(ly declared) factor did not frustrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25835 - 2017-09-21
erroneously exercised its discretion: (1) by deciding that the new(ly declared) factor did not frustrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25835 - 2017-09-21