Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15761 - 15770 of 68502 for did.

[PDF] NOTICE
, and the taxpayer did not rebut the presumption of correctness. We agree. Consequently, we reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45178 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
The board members argue that, because the prior Scocos action did not comply with the “State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98123 - 2013-06-12

State v. Randy J. Promer
then frisked Promer for weapons. ¶3 Falk did not find any weapons during the frisk. However, Falk felt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7444 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
that Zahrobsky was not particularly philanthropic, nor did she express a desire to keep her name in Edgar. Her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28422 - 2007-03-12

[PDF] Juanita Newman v. The City of Delafield
determined that she did not suffer any damages as a result of Dela-Hart’s trespass on her property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15750 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Terry Donskey v. Steve Rickert
Independent Builders did to the Rickerts’ home. The jury found in the Rickerts’ favor and awarded them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10751 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Andrew M. Hansen
to a chemical test. The State did not mark or move into evidence the actual form at the hearing, nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7348 - 2017-09-20

Town of Brookfield v. City of Brookfield
. On summary judgment, the circuit court held that the documents exchanged by the parties did not amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5248 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Steven D. Cathey
. She said she did not offer any verbal objections, even though she did not want to have sex, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15845 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the tenants to vacate the premises—a house in Elkhorn—no later than August 31, 2023. They did not move out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887424 - 2024-12-11