Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15761 - 15770 of 68514 for e j h.

[PDF] State v. Harlan Schwartz
. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J. Harlan Schwartz appeals orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4846 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Andrew James Garner
was submitted on the briefs of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and James M. Freimuth, assistant attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10264 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Eduardo Alicea
this in the context of a prosecutor’s responsibilities: [H]e is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4907 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Diane L. Finster v. James R. Finster
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Polk County: ROBERT H. RASMUSSEN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5892 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Arthur T. Donaldson v. Board of Commissioners of Rock-Koshkonong Lake District
of the circuit court for Rock County: JAMES E. WELKER, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4711 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” The State asked her how this made her feel and she said: “[h]e did stuff like that quite often, so I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143066 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
her how this made her feel and she said: “[h]e did stuff like that quite often, so I wasn’t afraid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143066 - 2015-06-15

State v. Stanley L. Felton
that it was his decision. [] [H]e indicated that he understood the exact situation that [had] presented itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18455 - 2005-06-06

State v. Andrew James Garner
of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and James M. Freimuth, assistant attorney general. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10264 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 129
on the briefs of Philip J. Brehm, Janesville. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28610 - 2014-09-15