Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15761 - 15770 of 17242 for probate/1000.
Search results 15761 - 15770 of 17242 for probate/1000.
State v. Brian J. Salentine
the Department of Probation and Parole to conduct a presentence investigation (PSI). The sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10122 - 2005-03-31
the Department of Probation and Parole to conduct a presentence investigation (PSI). The sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10122 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 263
or not the penalty is rebated, suspended, or probated, in this state or any other jurisdiction. It is immaterial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30978 - 2007-12-18
or not the penalty is rebated, suspended, or probated, in this state or any other jurisdiction. It is immaterial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30978 - 2007-12-18
State v. Earl L. Diehl
endangerment conviction, and a concurrent two-year term of probation on the bail jumping conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9627 - 2005-03-31
endangerment conviction, and a concurrent two-year term of probation on the bail jumping conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9627 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert D. Hanson
that its sentencing recommendation was agreed to “before we knew of the other [probation revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15001 - 2017-09-21
that its sentencing recommendation was agreed to “before we knew of the other [probation revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15001 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jerome L. Thoms
Thoms on probation. He argued that Wayman initiated the fight, was inebriated and was significantly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15297 - 2005-03-31
Thoms on probation. He argued that Wayman initiated the fight, was inebriated and was significantly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15297 - 2005-03-31
Kathleen R. Helland v. Kurtis A. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital
after probation was completed. As a result, she contends that she could only be discharged “for cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13797 - 2005-03-31
after probation was completed. As a result, she contends that she could only be discharged “for cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13797 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 111
’ imprisonment on each count, and placed Miller on probation for eight years. ¶16 In January 2000, Miller’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37036 - 2014-09-15
’ imprisonment on each count, and placed Miller on probation for eight years. ¶16 In January 2000, Miller’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37036 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 111
Miller on probation for eight years. ¶16 In January 2000, Miller’s trial counsel moved for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37036 - 2011-02-07
Miller on probation for eight years. ¶16 In January 2000, Miller’s trial counsel moved for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37036 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
on probation for eight years. ¶16 In January 2000, Miller’s trial counsel moved for a new trial under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36264 - 2014-09-15
on probation for eight years. ¶16 In January 2000, Miller’s trial counsel moved for a new trial under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36264 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
sentences of four years’ imprisonment on each count, and placed Miller on probation for eight years. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36264 - 2009-07-29
sentences of four years’ imprisonment on each count, and placed Miller on probation for eight years. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36264 - 2009-07-29