Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15771 - 15780 of 64735 for b's.
Search results 15771 - 15780 of 64735 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22, ¶17, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516 (“[B]efore an informant’s tip can give rise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32740 - 2008-05-19
. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22, ¶17, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516 (“[B]efore an informant’s tip can give rise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32740 - 2008-05-19
[PDF]
State v. Antoine J. Russell
. STAT. §§ 943.32(1)(b), (2), 939.05, 939.32, 939.62(1)(c), (2), 948.40(1), (3), 4(b) and 939.62(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7337 - 2017-09-20
. STAT. §§ 943.32(1)(b), (2), 939.05, 939.32, 939.62(1)(c), (2), 948.40(1), (3), 4(b) and 939.62(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7337 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2015-16). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211071 - 2018-04-18
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2015-16). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211071 - 2018-04-18
State v. David W. Oakley
for Sheboygan County: John b. murphy, Judge. Affirmed. Before Snyder, P.J., Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13902 - 2014-11-25
for Sheboygan County: John b. murphy, Judge. Affirmed. Before Snyder, P.J., Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13902 - 2014-11-25
Jay Vercauteren v. Rainbow Insulators, Inc.
(a) in denying his attorney-fee request, (b) in failing to award “enhanced wages” under § 109.11(2)(a),[1] and (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13850 - 2005-03-31
(a) in denying his attorney-fee request, (b) in failing to award “enhanced wages” under § 109.11(2)(a),[1] and (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13850 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey S. * v. Thomas A.f. *
, "[b]ecause the exercise of discretion is so essential to the trial court's functioning, we generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9151 - 2010-03-31
, "[b]ecause the exercise of discretion is so essential to the trial court's functioning, we generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9151 - 2010-03-31
State v. Donald J. Buford
that Buford knowingly waived his right to testify. B. Ineffective Assistance Claim. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31
that Buford knowingly waived his right to testify. B. Ineffective Assistance Claim. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 42
to § 102.61(1g)(b) and is subsequently fired for just cause, LIRC’s interpretation is not “long standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60297 - 2014-09-15
to § 102.61(1g)(b) and is subsequently fired for just cause, LIRC’s interpretation is not “long standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60297 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kelvin Griffin
generally will not review issues raised for the first time on appeal).3 B. Unduly Harsh Sentence Claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8573 - 2017-09-19
generally will not review issues raised for the first time on appeal).3 B. Unduly Harsh Sentence Claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8573 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert A. Cairns
. § 346.63(1)(a) and (b) (1997-98).[2] The State asserts that Cairns did not ask the arresting officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2871 - 2013-03-17
. § 346.63(1)(a) and (b) (1997-98).[2] The State asserts that Cairns did not ask the arresting officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2871 - 2013-03-17