Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15771 - 15780 of 29823 for des.
Search results 15771 - 15780 of 29823 for des.
Robert E. Bowman v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
which we review de novo. Browndale Int’l, Ltd. v. Board of Adjustment for Dane County, 60 Wis.2d 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11252 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo. Browndale Int’l, Ltd. v. Board of Adjustment for Dane County, 60 Wis.2d 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11252 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. Colstad, 260 Wis. 2d 406, ¶8. ¶13 Tomaw argues that the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108721 - 2017-09-21
subject to de novo review. Colstad, 260 Wis. 2d 406, ¶8. ¶13 Tomaw argues that the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108721 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Eddie Crews v. Freeman Roofing, Inc.
the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2261 - 2017-09-19
the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2261 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶7 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29994 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶7 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29994 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. CONST. art 1, § 7. We review de novo whether a defendant’s constitutional confrontation rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34813 - 2014-09-15
. CONST. art 1, § 7. We review de novo whether a defendant’s constitutional confrontation rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34813 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James M. Baldauf
of constitutional principles to the facts of the case which we review de novo. State v. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5079 - 2017-09-19
of constitutional principles to the facts of the case which we review de novo. State v. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5079 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
-04). Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32647 - 2014-09-15
-04). Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32647 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12318 - 2017-09-21
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12318 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frankie Kirk Rottier v. John Edward Walsh
. Co., 222 Wis.2d 627, 636, 586 N.W.2d 863, 866 (1998). And we review an unambiguous document de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14977 - 2017-09-21
. Co., 222 Wis.2d 627, 636, 586 N.W.2d 863, 866 (1998). And we review an unambiguous document de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14977 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-representation has been violated is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Darby, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572415 - 2022-10-04
-representation has been violated is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Darby, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572415 - 2022-10-04