Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15781 - 15790 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15781 - 15790 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the facts constitute a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Ibid. ¶11 In State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82322 - 2014-09-15
. Whether the facts constitute a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Ibid. ¶11 In State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82322 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Second, we review de novo the application of those historical facts to the constitutional principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131635 - 2017-09-21
. Second, we review de novo the application of those historical facts to the constitutional principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131635 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the statute applied to Brittany’s claim. ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027257 - 2025-10-22
the statute applied to Brittany’s claim. ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027257 - 2025-10-22
State v. Richard G. Giese
this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d 180, 195, 577 N.W.2d 794, 801 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14989 - 2005-03-31
this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d 180, 195, 577 N.W.2d 794, 801 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14989 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard R. Ludeking
of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7914 - 2005-03-31
of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7914 - 2005-03-31
State v. T.J. International, Inc.
deferring to the department’s determination. We also review the circuit court’s statutory interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16147 - 2005-03-31
deferring to the department’s determination. We also review the circuit court’s statutory interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16147 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the ambiguity. Id., ¶¶47-48 (citation omitted). Questions of statutory language are reviewed de novo. Myers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883808 - 2024-12-03
the ambiguity. Id., ¶¶47-48 (citation omitted). Questions of statutory language are reviewed de novo. Myers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883808 - 2024-12-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal question this court reviews de novo. Coston v. Joseph P., 222 Wis. 2d 1, 23, 586 N.W.2d 52 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989236 - 2025-07-30
is a legal question this court reviews de novo. Coston v. Joseph P., 222 Wis. 2d 1, 23, 586 N.W.2d 52 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989236 - 2025-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 28, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
standard, but review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles. Post, 301 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63282 - 2011-04-27
standard, but review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles. Post, 301 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63282 - 2011-04-27
State v. Keith A. Glass
a pretrial identification should be suppressed de novo. See State v. Benton, 2001 WI App 81, ¶5, 243 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4323 - 2005-03-31
a pretrial identification should be suppressed de novo. See State v. Benton, 2001 WI App 81, ¶5, 243 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4323 - 2005-03-31