Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15781 - 15790 of 30175 for de.
Search results 15781 - 15790 of 30175 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
earlier is a question of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607977 - 2023-01-10
earlier is a question of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607977 - 2023-01-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. See id. “We review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233552 - 2019-01-29
erroneous. See id. “We review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233552 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
State v. Miyosha K. White
eligibility will begin is a question of law this court would ordinarily review de novo. See Hughes v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7489 - 2017-09-20
eligibility will begin is a question of law this court would ordinarily review de novo. See Hughes v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7489 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Tecia D.B.
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6838 - 2017-09-20
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6838 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168401 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168401 - 2017-09-21
Richard Zeininger v. Affordable Builders of Wisconsin, Inc.
presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Borchardt v. Wilk, 156 Wis.2d 420, 427, 456 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8349 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Borchardt v. Wilk, 156 Wis.2d 420, 427, 456 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8349 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Maureen B. Fitzgerald
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25393 - 2006-06-01
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25393 - 2006-06-01
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Susan Collins
of an insurance contract presents a question of law which we review de novo. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6793 - 2005-03-31
of an insurance contract presents a question of law which we review de novo. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6793 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence. State v. Koeppen, 2000 WI App 121, ¶33, 237 Wis. 2d 418, 614 N.W.2d 530. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59510 - 2011-01-31
evidence. State v. Koeppen, 2000 WI App 121, ¶33, 237 Wis. 2d 418, 614 N.W.2d 530. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59510 - 2011-01-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was procedurally barred is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147020 - 2015-08-24
was procedurally barred is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147020 - 2015-08-24