Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15791 - 15800 of 64771 for b's.
Search results 15791 - 15800 of 64771 for b's.
Jerome E.M. v. Gail M.
) what she also considers the trial court’s inappropriate emphasis on § 767.24(4)(b), Stats., and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14553 - 2005-03-31
) what she also considers the trial court’s inappropriate emphasis on § 767.24(4)(b), Stats., and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14553 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
A., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. CASSANDRA B., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35230 - 2014-09-15
A., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. CASSANDRA B., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35230 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Michael T. v. Norma Briggs
is § 813.122(3)(b)1, which provides that guardians ad litem appointed by the court in child-abuse proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10789 - 2017-09-20
is § 813.122(3)(b)1, which provides that guardians ad litem appointed by the court in child-abuse proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10789 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Under WIS. ADMIN. CODE § EAB 4.08(2)(b) (Apr. 2006), the EAB investigates student complaints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112768 - 2017-09-21
Under WIS. ADMIN. CODE § EAB 4.08(2)(b) (Apr. 2006), the EAB investigates student complaints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112768 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of stalking, as a repeater, under WIS. STAT. §§ 940.32(2) and 939.62(1)(b) (2021-22).1 Latimer argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705876 - 2023-09-27
of stalking, as a repeater, under WIS. STAT. §§ 940.32(2) and 939.62(1)(b) (2021-22).1 Latimer argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705876 - 2023-09-27
State v. Kevin Brown
to deliver, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 161.16(2)(b)1. and 161.41(1m)(c)3. (1987‑88). In January 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21376 - 2006-03-22
to deliver, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 161.16(2)(b)1. and 161.41(1m)(c)3. (1987‑88). In January 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21376 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
record as required by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32(1)(b)2. We affirmed Morris’s conviction and relieved Lang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73344 - 2014-09-15
record as required by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32(1)(b)2. We affirmed Morris’s conviction and relieved Lang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73344 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth R. Schewe
his parole eligibility date. However, §§ 304.06(1)(b) and 973.014(1)(b) address the “earliest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11695 - 2005-03-31
his parole eligibility date. However, §§ 304.06(1)(b) and 973.014(1)(b) address the “earliest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11695 - 2005-03-31
Eldon Boddie v. David H. Schwarz
, he was incarcerated on other charges well within the fifty-day limit allowed under § 302.335(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11271 - 2005-03-31
, he was incarcerated on other charges well within the fifty-day limit allowed under § 302.335(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11271 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terry L. Schroedl
each in turn. ¶15 First, under § 972.11(2)(b)3, evidence of prior untruthful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3983 - 2005-03-31
each in turn. ¶15 First, under § 972.11(2)(b)3, evidence of prior untruthful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3983 - 2005-03-31