Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15791 - 15800 of 17105 for probate/1000.
Search results 15791 - 15800 of 17105 for probate/1000.
State v. Russell L. Dawber
to the ambiguity of the agreement only in the context of arguing for a sentence of supervised probation. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5462 - 2005-03-31
to the ambiguity of the agreement only in the context of arguing for a sentence of supervised probation. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5462 - 2005-03-31
James Turner. v. David H. Schwarz
“[T]he review process for both probation and parole revocation is identical.” State ex rel. Macemon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13897 - 2005-03-31
“[T]he review process for both probation and parole revocation is identical.” State ex rel. Macemon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13897 - 2005-03-31
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Town of Caledonia
a statute which provided probation violators in counties of less than 500,000 with judicial hearings while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9751 - 2005-03-31
a statute which provided probation violators in counties of less than 500,000 with judicial hearings while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9751 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
complaint; Officer Lough was not identified by Cameron in No. 2013AP1447 9 his signed probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114791 - 2017-09-21
complaint; Officer Lough was not identified by Cameron in No. 2013AP1447 9 his signed probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114791 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
in probation program under s. 973.11 claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30297 - 2014-09-15
in probation program under s. 973.11 claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30297 - 2014-09-15
State v. William W. Boyd
to this forfeiture, the court ordered a sentence of three years of probation and a fine of $5000—the maximum fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16083 - 2005-03-31
to this forfeiture, the court ordered a sentence of three years of probation and a fine of $5000—the maximum fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16083 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the probation recommendation made by the author of the presentence investigation report. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118163 - 2014-09-15
the probation recommendation made by the author of the presentence investigation report. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118163 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kathleen R. Helland v. Kurtis A. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital
nature after probation was completed. As a result, she contends that she could only be discharged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13797 - 2014-09-15
nature after probation was completed. As a result, she contends that she could only be discharged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13797 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael Brandt
, placed him on probation for ten years consecutive to the prison term and imposed a $7500 fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12516 - 2005-03-31
, placed him on probation for ten years consecutive to the prison term and imposed a $7500 fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12516 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. On the remaining ten counts, the court withheld sentence in favor of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114858 - 2014-06-24
of extended supervision. On the remaining ten counts, the court withheld sentence in favor of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114858 - 2014-06-24