Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1581 - 1590 of 8229 for WA 0812 2782 5310 [[PANDAWA]] Jasa Panel Dinding Modern Jaten Karanganyar.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that there are no African-Americans on this jury panel. The— THE COURT: Just so the record is clear even though I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197435 - 2017-10-10

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 29, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
without further reference to the restraints in the presence of the jury panel; outside the presence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92113 - 2013-01-28

State v. David William Newbury
three alternates, was selected from a panel of fifty prospective jurors. Thirty-three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8719 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Robert Bingen v. Lisa Bzdusek
, subject to the confirmation of the city council. Id. It further provided that a reviewing panel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4578 - 2017-09-19

Michael Baxter v. William Lynch
rejected the testimony of Baxter’s expert witness that the body panels were damaged by Lynch’s sandblasting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24912 - 2006-05-02

COURT OF APPEALS
of the sixty-four members of the jury pool were African-American, none ended up on his jury panel. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74931 - 2011-12-13

[PDF] State v. Saturnino R. Guerra-Reyna
- the jury panel a person of a "cognizable" class because the prosecutor believes that a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7748 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the jury pool were African-American, none ended up on his jury panel. ¶3 “The point at which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74931 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Howard C. Carter
is alleged to be subjectively biased from the jury panel. The relevant portion of the voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4338 - 2017-09-19

Waupaca County v. Terry L. Winters
continued after the judge denied Winters’ motion for mistrial and ultimately the six-member jury panel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20553 - 2005-12-07