Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1581 - 1590 of 4815 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Talun Blitar.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to a child violated Gonzalez’s constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy. After Gonzalez’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379590 - 2021-06-22

[PDF] State v. Kevin Jones
1992 double homicide in exchange for a reduction of then- pending charges and a nonprosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14506 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
mistrial. Coughlin argues that his retrial violated the double jeopardy clause because, in his view
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214284 - 2018-06-13

[PDF] OWI Guidelines District 7 (effective October 1, 2018)
(§346.65(7))] REVOCATION: 12 – 18 Months (doubles under (§343.30(1q)(b)4m)), plus number of days of jail
/publications/fees/docs/d7owi2017-2.pdf - 2018-10-02

[PDF] 2017 OWI Guidelines District 7
(On & After 06-01-2017) 12 – 18 Months (doubles under (§343.30(1q)(b)4m)), plus number of days of jail
/publications/fees/docs/d7owi2017.pdf - 2017-07-21

[PDF] 2015 OWI Guidelines District 7
(§346.65(7))] REVOCATION: 12 – 18 Months (doubles under (§343.30(1q)(b)4m)), plus number of days of jail
/publications/fees/docs/d7owi2015.pdf - 2015-09-02

Shirley A. Smedema v. Milwaukee Guardian Insurance Company
settlement for $165,000, she is entitled to pre-judgment interest and double costs under Rule 807.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10562 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Shirley A. Smedema v. Milwaukee Guardian Insurance Company
and double costs under RULE 807.01, and ordinary costs under RULES 814.01 & 814.04, STATS. No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10562 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
addressed Wis. Stat. § 961.45 (2007-08),[1] providing for double jeopardy protection against successive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36810 - 2009-07-28

[PDF] Mark Lattimore v. Caldon Rushing
him double damages, costs, and reasonable attorneys fees for violating an administrative rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24572 - 2017-09-21